Showing posts with label exposure. Show all posts
Showing posts with label exposure. Show all posts

Monday, 31 March 2014

How to avoid getting shot in the foot; or Burlesque photography etiquette for beginners


A couple of incidents recently have brought this topic to the forefront of my mind.  We are very lucky in the ACT we have a significant number of really excellent burlesque event photographers. They do amazing work are incredibly supportive and very understanding of the etiquette around shooting shows were people expose themselves.

However, occasionally we are unlucky enough to have significant misunderstandings with photographers we don’t know so well.  I’ve done some thinking about this and here are my top tips for avoiding misunderstandings and keeping stress to a minimum on both sides.
For Producers:
When engaging a photographer:

1/. Be CLEAR about what you want and what you can spend.  This might seem obvious but sometimes producers are so used to dealing with photographers that already know they forget to fill in the blanks when engaging a different photographer.  What do you expect? How much can you pay? When can they post the images?  These are all things that will need to be addressed.

2/. Explain the rules.  A new photographer may not know the burlesque etiquette we take for granted.  You know the ones; no pastie shots on the internet (without the performers express permission), which performers don’t like to photographed, only use stage names etc.

3/. Know the law.  In Australia copyright belongs TO THE PHOTOGRAPHER.  We have some limited control because events are usually private (ticketed and secure) but that control is limited.  Maintaining a good relationship with the photographer is the best way to ensure that photos don’t end up in places you don’t want them.

When a photographer approaches you at an event:
1/. Did they approach you?  You do not have to let them take photographs.  It is (likely) a private ticketed event and you have every right to request that they not take photographs.  If you let them shoot the event make sure you (or another organiser) have time on the night to explain burlesque photography etiquette to them.

2/. Tell them up front if they can expect payment for this or not.  You have no contract in place, you are not obliged to provide financial consideration and conversely, they are not required to provide you with images (see on copyright above).  If they want payment and you can’t afford it, politely decline to have them shoot the event.  I my experience my photographers who show up to a ticketed event (with a ticket) are pretty understanding, if they aren’t you probably don’t want them there anyway.

3/. CHECK WITH THE PERFORMERS!  This might seem obvious but if there is no agreement in place to photograph the show some of the performers may prefer not to be photographed.  Before you let anyone shoot a performance be sure that the performers are okay with it.  If they aren’t be VERY clear about who can and cannot be photographed.

For Photographers:
0/. (Yes, I made a zero because I think this one should go without saying.)  Want to shoot at an event? Ask.  Be prepared for the producer to say no, if they say no, don't argue.  If you shoot an event without express permission expect people to get upset with you.  Performers and producers go to great lengths to protect their brand/image and you're infringing on that.

1/. Same as for producers; be CLEAR about what you expect.  As I already mentioned producers are so used to dealing with photographers that already know they sometimes forget to fill in the blanks when engaging a different photographer.  What do you expect? What can they expect at the end? How much do you need to make the gig a reasonable one? When can you post the images?  These are all things that will need to be addressed.

2/. Be considerate.  This is slightly different than a regular gig, not only is this the performers brand, it’s their body.  It is fraught with all kinds of considerations.

3/. If you are approached by someone outside the event organisers (press, interested parties etc) for an image please check with the performer (preferred) or the producers before supplying that image.  This can cause huge amounts of anxiety that are not necessary.  You generally wouldn’t publish a photo of anyone else without permission the performers are no different.

4/. Please do not publish pastie shots. This is the final reveal, the punchline so to speak.  Some performers don’t mind but unless you have express permission to post these shots please don’t.

5/. Do not go backstage without EXPRESS PERMISSION. It might seem that this goes without saying but sometimes people get carried away wanting to capture the entire event.  If you don’t have permission to be backstage ask, some performers are very careful of how they allow themselves to be captured.

6/. Ugly faces.  If the body looks amazing but the face doesn’t, please don’t post it.  Burlesque performers’ faces sometimes do some funny things that don’t translate well to still images.  Crossed eyes, tongues out etc…  This is our brand, we rely on looking amazing EVERYWHERE.
 
In the end burlesque photography etiquette is easy, as long as everyone is on the same page.

Monday, 27 January 2014

Exposing for exposure - Performing for Free

This image has been doing the rounds on and off for a while now and it always gets me thinking.  It seems somewhat hypocritical of me given that I spent over a year producing Mondayitis Cabaret a charity night that asked performers to donate their time and talents but generally I agree with this sentiment*.
 
The problem with working for free is that it can make even the most passionate hobby unsustainable.  Burlesque particularly is a very expensive art form, costumes, make up, grooming all take time and money.  There are several arguments that clients might use when asking artist to work for free.
 
 'We have a limited budget', often means 'We would like you to work for free or for 'in kind' payment. 'In kind' covers things like; food and drink or additional complementary tickets to the event. 
 
Food and drink as 'in kind' is a lovely idea but performers often do not have time to eat or drink at a performance.  The other thing that this does not take into account is that eating and drinking are not the costs a performer incurs at a performance, you need transportation to the gig, time spent rehearsing and preparing an act.  Unless you are performing at Rockpool or The Fat Duck the cost of a meal is likely to be much less than your regular fee.
 
Complementary tickets to the event is a cheeky way of making you feel like your in kind payment is of a higher value.  Whatever the event ticket price is for a 'for profit' event there will be a margin.  It is far cheaper for the producer to offer you some free tickets especially if it is an event that is unlikely to sell out than it would be for them to pay you the retail value of those tickets.  Unless it is an event you would have paid to attend anyway you are coming out worse off in this arrangement.
Additionally often paid gigs will offer 1 or 2 complementary tickets to performers and even if they don't your fee should be enough to cover a small personal cheer squad, obviously dependent on the ticket price.
 
The offer to include you on our press releases and media materials may sound generous but  in my experience I have received more media coverage for shows that I have been paid to perform in.  If a producer is paying the performers a fee they have a much more vested interest in ensuring that you're promoted in order to sell tickets.

Charity events are a slightly different affair; the call to donate an act or two is something that is up to the individual performer.  I used to produce Mondayitis Cabaret which was a fundraising night for the ACT domestic violence crises service for which I asked performers to donate their time and talents. I would never ask performers I didn't know well and I certainly never put pressure on anyone to perform.  If you aren't able to perform for free don't allow a producer to pressure you into it. 

I suppose in the end I agree with the final statement, if those creating the art aren't prepared to put a value on it even if it is only a nominal amount how can we expect others to value it? 

*This post does not cover TFP arrangements where artist collaborate in order to produce images or film that can be used by both parties.  This kind of work is a fantastic way for artists to build their portfolio.